Depends on what you're looking for. Latency for both XFS and EXT4. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. . Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. . 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. You can see several XFS vs ext4 benchmarks on phoronix. g. Which is better largely depends on opinion. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. For a while, MySQL (not Maria DB) had performance issues on XFS with default settings, but even that is a thing of the past. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. •. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. repeat with all candidate filesystems in my case it was ext3, XFS, ReiserFS and JFS. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. That one is solid and mature. For zfs there is a plugin. XFS. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. EXT4 Vs XFS. XFS. I hear zfs is good too. XFS doesn't have any RAID, while Btrfs RAID is not yet completely stable and is in its early days. It does its job well. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation of. Tweaking the config is easy if you've figured out how to build and load your own kernel. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. 또한 ext3. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Thanks. EXT4. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. Now, lot of development efforts are pushed to Btrfs development and most probably it will become next generation default FS for Linux, a successor of EXT4. Various internet sources suggest that XFS is faster and better, but taking into account that they also suggest that EXT4 is. 7. With all of the major file-systems seeing clean-up work during the Linux 4. On lower thread counts, it’s as much as 50% faster than EXT4. Also, server raid originally md raid5 (4x4TB NAS drives) with XFS had taken all day to build, but creating btrfs-raid10 was seconds. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. 4. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. 15 Git kernels. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. SSD Disk Observations. 1. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. . XFS has a few features that ext4 has not like CoW but it can't be shrinked while ext4 can. 0 SSD testing ran into a strange performance drop while Btrfs. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. 📽️ Abonnez-vous : Devenir membre VIP : et se former à #Linux, voici ce que je vous propose dans cet. wiki. the mirrored pairs would be much faster for both reads and writes. Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. e. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. ext4 4 threads: 74 MiB/sec. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. Even if you do notice. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. For the Proxmox host, if you install it and use LVM-thin as root pool option in the Proxmox installer, it will automatically make a root partition in EXT4. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. Regarding filesystems. But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. But yeah, it's (BTRFS) a more complex filesystem with a bottomless pit of asterisks and gotchas attached to it, EXT4 is much more limited in scope and much simpler from a design perspective. • 2 yr. All have pros and cons. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. On the HDD the Bcachefs performance was just behind EXT4 but doing much better than Btrfs though not nearly as fast as XFS in this. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. So I did two rounds: the. But btrfs is not by any stretch the default Linux file system. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. Now Fedora just needs to implement it properly like openSUSE. But EXT4 is mature, rock solid, and completely reliable, and the standard for most of the linux world. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. May 1, 2016 at 10:46. yield a very fast imaging backup. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. This process have two main steps: 1. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. Between EXT4 and XFS which file system is better when an application uses multiple threads to read/write large amount of small files on a SSD. XFS vs. Hi, I think BTRFS is actually faster then ZFS on Linux. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. 2. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. FYI: btrfs. Diferenças básicas entre o Ext4 e o Btrfs. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. Btrfs vs. I can't make out whether this will remove hot spots when the underlying raid device changes, but a plain rebalance will rewrite the entire file system, so it looks like it will. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. and probably also not xfs. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. Out of Ext4 or btrfs, I would chose btrfs with the snapshots. #11. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. The ext FilesystemsBtrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. 0 File-System. 1. 7 - EXT4 vs. Este vídeo muestra el rendimiento de los sistemas de archivos mas usados en un entorno muy parecido al que se encuentra en producción en servidores de archiv. El ext4 y xf. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server ships with different file systems from which to choose, including Btrfs, Ext4, Ext3, Ext2 and XFS. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. . Posts: 5,135. Ext4 is the default filesystem in Manjaro at the moment. All of these Linux. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. En el caso de los servidores NAS de Synology, tenemos la posibilidad de configurar EXT4 o Btrfs, de hecho, en el asistente de configuración de los volúmenes podremos elegir entre uno y otro sin ningún problema. EXT4 is functional and is considered more stable. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. zfs not. Btrfs vs Ext4. XFS. XFS and ext4 now calculate a checksum on metadata and their journal files. Tích hợp Cloud Station Server, Drive mang hiệu quả cao. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, Btrfs support CoW so users can create writable and read-only. This is because BTRFS is optimized for handling small files, while EXT4 can struggle with multiple small files due to its delayed allocation. XFS vs. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. I've set up and used btrfs for years and later zfs for the past few years both professionally and on home servers. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. For example, xfs cannot shrink. 드라이브 압축. It is the default file system in RHEL 6, Debian 7, Ubuntu 18 and so on. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. 2. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Running this fio command, I get about 2. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. Btrfs vs. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). It utilizes a b+tree structure instead of the traditional linear layout found in most filesystems today, allowing it to better manage larger datasets more efficiently than other systems like ext4 or Xfs. btrfs was slower and had reliability problems. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. Phoronix: Linux 5. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. EXT4 has entirely different design goals, none of which are data integrity. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. The stock mount options were used for all of the testing. 多设备的集成卷管理 Expand section "6. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Vide. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. As for filesystems, not sure I'd bother considering JFS since I believe it may be deprecated out of the kernel soon. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. ext3 is the most common format. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. The btrfs backup multi-disk arrangement, of different disk sizes in single mode was for me a trial of btrfs. BTRFS solves all the problems I had so far: supports online resizing - both extending and shrinking. 암호화 기능. EXT4 vs. ago. Approach 1: Build your own kernel, and tweak it's build config to pre-link btrfs. Linux 5. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. 5. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. A maximum. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. are two different decisions you have to make. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. Btrfs stands for B Tree Filesystem, It is often pronounced as “better-FS” or “butter-FS. I did this to all of my partitions, including home. A) crater. Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 20 January 2018. . Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. Unfortunately you will probably lose a few files in both cases. No such built-in compression support is in Ext4. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. ext4 is not recommended. Comparing the two is a semi-futile exercise. 2 See what others are saying What is btrfs? Btrfs, which stands for B-tree file system, is a modern and advanced file system that supports many features, such as snapshots, compression,. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example:The question is XFS vs EXT4. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. Note that while these tests are not indicative of real-world performance, we can extrapolate these results and use this as one reason. I'd stick with safer file systems like XFS, JFS, EXT4, or imported ZFSOnLinux. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. Overview of File Systems in Linux. 6 Comments With FS-Mark there was a very noticeable drop with the XFS file-system with KPTI and Retpoline enabled while EXT4 saw the second largest drop while Btrfs and. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. the COW which saves alot of space and increases the speed. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. 불가능. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. Ext4 seems better suited for lower-spec configurations although it will work just fine on faster ones as well, and performance-wise still better than btrfs in most cases. webbphillips • 8 mo. It's rigid and inflexible. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both. LVM has snapshots. In the case of the Intel 900p SSD, the XFS results were too fast to accurately measure while EXT4 and F2FS took just two seconds to complete while Btrfs took six seconds. 1. exFAT is the best choice at the moment. To have best performance use noatime mount option, and I also recommend to use mount option. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. Changing the storage driver will make any containers you have already created inaccessible on the local system. When comparing XFS vs EXT4, XFS also offers unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (in case you need it), and, in recent versions, reflink support. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. XFS vs Ext4. . What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. With btrfs I got 130-160MB. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. kernel. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Each of these file systems has its own way of. Share. That bug apart, any delayed allocation filesystem (ext4 and btrfs included) will lose a significant number or un-synched data in case of uncontrolled poweroff. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. This section highlights the differences when using or administering an XFS file system. XFS 和 ext4 的比较. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen Dateien als EXT4. ZFS likes eating RAM. ext4 is not recommended. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. Januar 2020. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. Ext4 provides more flexibility in terms of data storage. NTFS. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. But again, there's no real point in going with btrfs if only using two drives. It is suitable for PC platforms and network. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. I use ext4 everywhere. Mount the partition and test the conversion by checking the files. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. User quotas for each shared folder. - no encryption. XFS is more and more mature than Btrfs, but. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. F2FS vs. Page 2 of 2. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new. Modern Linux filesystems, such as ext4, Btrfs and JFS, do store the file creation time (aka birth time), but use different names for the field in question (crtime in ext4, otime in Btrfs and JFS). However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. org. In the future, Linux distributions will gradually shift towards BtrFS. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. In this tutorial, we will check Btrfs against Ext4 filesystem, and seek to understand their functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. これらのファイルシステムはEXT4、Btrfs、ZFSであり、XNUMXつのファイルシステムは異なる特性を持ち、いくつかは異なるシナリオでより優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。 外部4. The only case where XFS is slower is when creating/deleting a lot of small files. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. 1 Overview of File Systems in Linux. The 3TB HDD are ext4. - No RAID. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. . ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. Partition Size: Ext4 supports partition size up to 1 EiB, while Btrfs supports partition size up to 16 EiB. with mirrored pairs, you also have the option of. 7. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. Btrfs is not a successor to the default Ext4 file system used in most Linux distributions, but it can be expected to replace Ext4 in the future. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. But none of these will be relevant to a bog standard use case like "browsing the internet and sometimes. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. 15 kernel can see our dozens of articles covering this. ) keep in mind that the performance are not the same depending on the chosen file system , also note that btrfs (video-1, video-2) may be a very good option because of its snapshot feature and data structure. Because of this, and because EXT4 seems to have better TRIM support, my habit is to make SSD boot/root drives EXT4, and non-root bulk data spinning-rust drives/arrays XFS. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. EDIT 1: Added that BTRFS is the default filesystem for Red Hat but only on Fedora. No compression, but compaction. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Mount ntfs drives only read only. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". Btrfs vs. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. 7. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. The Btrfs partition scheme preset creates an ext4 /boot, and a Btrfs pool. Built By the Slant team. The four hard drives used for testing were 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS (ST6000VN0033. Both. With 4K random reads by FIO, the SATA/USB performance was flat across the. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. Crypto2. OMV supports btrfs but you still have to scrub etc yourself from the command line.